On 8 December 2012, at the end of the 2012 UN Climate Change Conference, an agreement was reached to extend the protocol until 2020 and set a date for 2015 for the development of a new document to be implemented from 2020 (see more information under the direction of e. Mail).  The outcome of the Doha negotiations received mixed reactions, with small island states critical of the package as a whole. The second Kyoto commitment period applies to about 11% of global greenhouse gas emissions per year. Other conference outcomes are a timetable for a comprehensive agreement that is expected to be adopted by 2015 and will encompass all countries.  At the Doha meeting of the parties to the UNFCCC on 8 December 2012, the European Union`s chief climate negotiator, Artur Runge-Metzger, pledged to extend the binding treaty for the 27 European Member States until 2020 until 2020 until 2020. Article 6 has been described as relating to some of the main provisions of the Paris Agreement.  Overall, it describes the cooperative approaches that the parties can take to achieve their national reductions in CO2 emissions. It thus contributes to making the Paris Agreement the framework for a global carbon market. A 33% reduction in per capita emissions in 2030 compared to practice. This would double per capita emissions from current levels, rather than triple as usual. A commitment provided that international support is declared. Contains the adjustment section. The INDC of Zimbabwe. A 20% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 compared to 2010, with the longer-term goal of reducing emissions by 50% by 2050. These targets will cost $3.7 billion for 2015-2030 and $6.0 billion in 2030. This commitment depends on favourable international climate funding. Equatorial Guinea INDC. At the 2011 UN Climate Change Conference, the Durban Platform (and the ad hoc working group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action) were created to negotiate a legal instrument to mitigate climate change from 2020. The resulting agreement is expected to be adopted in 2015.  In its fundamental objective, the MDS will be broadly similar to the Clean Development Mechanism, which will contribute to the reduction of global greenhouse gas emissions and support sustainable development through dual emissions.  Although the structure and processes that govern MDS are not yet defined, some similarities and differences with the own development mechanism are already noticeable. In particular, unlike the clean development mechanism, the MDS will be available to all parties, unlike only parts of Schedule 1, which will make it much broader.  The level of NCC defined by each country will determine the objectives of that country. However, the “contributions” themselves are not binding under international law because of the lack of specificity, normative nature or language necessary to establish binding standards.  In addition, there will be no mechanism to compel a country to set a target in its NDC on a specified date and not for an application if a defined target is not achieved in an NDC.   There will be only one “Name and Shame” system or as “I`m Our Pesztor,” the United States.